Skip to main content

Chased by the Law: Julian Assange

  In lieu of the documentary we recently watched on WikiLeaks, I did a bit of digging. After clicking many links, I found an article written by Australian journalist and documentary film maker John Pilger in 2014, detailing the various wrongdoings and violations of Julian Assange's human rights during Sweden's seven-year preliminary investigation into an allegation of rape. Violations include the years-long placement of Assange in pre-charge detention, and the denial of his right to due process. 

  Although Swedish investigators have since dropped the case against Assange, authorities recently uncovered the involvement of the UK's Crown Prosecution service in destroying key emails regarding the WikiLeaks founder after the lawyer on the UK end of the investigation retired in 2014. It has also been revealed that the lawyer in question had advised Swedish officials to not visit London to interview Julian Assange in 2010 or 2011, prolonging his standoff with authorities at the Ecuadorian embassy in London. 

  Some people believe that the Swedish investigation into the rape allegations had false intentions, later causing people to refer to Assange as a 'political prisoner' who was hunted because of the information WikiLeaks has leaked. To be honest, I wouldn't be surprised if that's the case. With the amount of times that the United States has called for charges, calling him a "terrorist', stating he is a threat to world peace and democracy, he's clearly not their favourite person. While there may be some grey areas surrounding WikiLeaks, they have made many important contributions to journalism as a whole, and have given the public information and insight on things they otherwise wouldn't dream of knowing about. If we are aiming for a truly free press, we can not only be in favour of the press when it is not targeting our own country. In events like that, the press is doing precisely what the people are asking of it, typically for the benefit of society. 
  
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Starting With the Basics

     This past Thursday, Halifax Judge Gregory Lenehan acquitted yet another cab driver of sexual assault. The provincial judge ruled that Houssen Milad could walk free.  Vice News  reported that although Lenehan believed the complainant was sexually assaulted in the summer of 2016, there was Crown had failed to prove that Milad was responsible. A  Metro News reporter  who was in court for the ruling stated that the judge"slammed the Crown for doing a “disservice” to the complainant and the community by failing to conduct a proper investigation." Lenehan has a long-standing history of acquittals and sexual assault cases. In March, he also acquitted cab driver Bassam Al-Rawi of two alleged sexual assaults, the first of which involved a woman so intoxicated that she was passed out in the back of his cab. However, despite her having a blood alcohol level between 223 and 244 milligrams of alcohol per 100 millilitres of blood, roughly three times the lega...

Writing the News Articles

Suspected Kidnappers in Custody, Child not Found      Roughly two weeks ago, local preschooler Julia Carter, age 5, went missing. One week later, Sophie Harris, a student at Silverton Junior High. was abducted. And now, just two days ago, Eva Davis has been abducted.       Despite the arrest and pending prosecution of her suspected captors, Eva's whereabouts are currently unknown. The two men, aged 29 and 37, deny any involvement in the three cases, despite an overwhelming knowledge of each case.       Giving the surprising amount of disappearances that occurred in the past weeks, parents, as well as local law enforcement, are on edge.      "It's an awful feeling," Mrs. Davis proclaimed; "You feel as though you failed your child, failed as a parent". "No mother should ever have to wonder if their child is dead or alive".       If you or someone you know has any information regarding her pote...

Battling Lies: The Invasion of Fake News

As convincing as the word of some random person on the internet can be, I do not believe that the flowers in question have birth defects caused by nuclear radiation. For starters, "not much more to say, this is what happens when flowers get nuclear birth defects" isn't the most convincing argument. They're acting as though it must be true simply because they say it is. Also, using a picture with a perfectly normal flower in the corner doesn't help your case. It almost looks as if two of the flowers in the image were simply bent to look abnormal. For these reasons, I do not believe that the flowers in question have nuclear birth defects caused by excessive exposure to radiation. In less than a minute, I found a 2015 article posted by  National Geographic  that confirmed my suspicions. While it is possible for radiation to cause similar defects in flowers, scientists believe it is highly unlikely in this case. One reason for their doubt comes from the location o...